Improving Recovery for Belief Bases
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Recovery postulate for contraction says that any beliefs lost due to the contraction of some belief p should return if p is immediately re-asserted. Recovery holds for logically closed sets of beliefs, but it does not hold for belief bases (sets of beliefs that are not logically closed). This paper discusses the Recovery aspect of the belief base optimizing operation of reconsideration (which performs hindsight belief change) and compares it to the adherence to Recovery of traditional base and belief liberation contraction operations. We also discuss the similarities and differences between the belief base manipulations for belief liberation vs. those for reconsideration — because both approaches support the concept that removing a belief from a base might allow some previously removed beliefs to return.
منابع مشابه
Base Belief Change and Optimized Recovery
Optimized Recovery (OR) adds belief base optimization to the traditional Recovery postulate—improving Recovery adherence without sacrificing adherence to the more accepted postulates or to the foundations approach. Reconsideration and belief liberation systems both optimize a knowledge base through consolidation of a chain of base beliefs; and recovered base beliefs are returned to the base. Th...
متن کاملAutomated Revision of Clips Rule-bases
This paper describes CLIPS-R, a theory revision system for the revision of CLIPS rule-bases. CLIPS-R may be used for a variety of knowledge-base revision tasks, such as re ning a prototype system, adapting an existing system to slightly di erent operating conditions, or improving an operational system that makes occasional errors. We present a description of how CLIPS-R revises rule-bases, and ...
متن کاملUsing GRAPHICAL-BELIEF to predict risk of Coronary Artery Disease
Medical knowledge about risks consists of a combination of structural information about known biological facts and probabilistic or actuarial information about exposures to hazards and recovery rates. While both types of information present significant practical challenges, probabilistic information is especially difficult to use because (1) it requires constant maintenance as new studies provi...
متن کاملOn the Definition of Essential and Contingent Properties of Subjective Belief Bases
In this paper, we introduce several features of subjective belief bases from both individualistic and collective perspectives and hence provide suitable essential and contingent properties for such belief bases. Essential properties reflect the attributes of a belief base being considered in vacuum, whereas contingent properties of a belief base reveal its characteristics with regards to the re...
متن کاملContraction in Propositional Logic
The AGM model for the revision and contraction of belief sets provides rationality postulates for each of the two cases. In the context of finite propositional logic, Katsuno and Mendelzon pointed out postulates for the revision of belief bases which correspond to the AGM postulates for the revision of beliefs sets. In this paper, we present postulates for the contraction of propositional belie...
متن کامل